Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Effective climate change response requires constructive science-policy engagement, yet what role interpretations climate scientists hold at the science-policy interface, which factors shape these interpretations, and how they relate to actual communication behaviour remain empirically underexplored. We surveyed German climate scientists (N = 249) and identified five distinct profiles: Advocating Brokers, Engaged Advocates, Reserved Academics, Policy Advisors, and Traditional Academics. Notably, the latter group --- preferring detachment from societal and policy engagement --- represents only a small minority. These findings provide insights into the ways scientists navigate their engagement at the science-policy boundary, contributing to the ongoing discourse on scientific advocacy in post-normal science contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolhep et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: