Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the rheological, structural-mechanical, and strength properties of composite cement-based binders containing finely dispersed mineral fillers, including limestone, zeolite-containing rock, and microsilica. The effects of cement content in the range of 10–50% on water demand, yield stress, setting time, and 28-day compressive strength were experimentally evaluated at comparable mixture plasticity. The results showed that water demand strongly depended on the type of mineral filler, with microsilica-containing compositions requiring the highest water-to-solid ratios and limestone-containing compositions the lowest. Increasing the cement content reduced the water-to-solid ratio, decreased yield stress, and accelerated both initial and final setting. The yield stress–cement content relationships were satisfactorily described by exponential regression models, with coefficients of determination of 0.971-0.998. At comparable plasticity, the 28-day compressive strength ranged from 7.4 to 48.6 MPa, with the highest values obtained for limestone-containing compositions, followed by zeolite-containing and microsilica-containing compositions. Linear regression models were used for preliminary selection of cement content to achieve a target compressive strength. For a target strength of 25 MPa, the calculated cement contents were approximately 26.3 %, 29.8 %, and 46.5 % for limestone-, zeolite-, and microsilica-containing binders, respectively. The results provide a basis for rational selection of composite binder compositions for masonry and plaster mortars using local mineral raw materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turgunbayev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: