Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper reviews psychology’s long history of writings about human genius. A definition of genius is offered and explicated: “The capacity to imagine and implement a generally unforeseen domain change that, when eventually recognized, is widely accepted as an advance in that domain.” The review synthesizes informative findings from existing studies of genius, regarding: (1) the mental and personal dispositions of geniuses; (2) the roles of heredity and native talent; (3) the consequences of early giftedness; (4) the ways that individuals of genius interact with their social environments; (5) the workings of highly creative thinking; (6) the cognitive and social relations between geniuses and the domains they transform; (7) the roles of life conditions such as family composition, birth order, schooling, and mental health; (8) the importance of motivational factors such as purpose; and (9) the developmental trajectory of creative eminence. The review confirms the validity of the concept of individual genius, despite recent critical arguments to the contrary; and it asserts the usefulness of the concept for providing an understanding of the workings and potentials of peak human creativity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Damon (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: