Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective Microvascular invasion (MVI) predicts postoperative recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet preoperative prediction remains challenging. This study compared a Transformer, a convolutional neural network (CNN), and a multiple instance learning (MIL) framework for predicting MVI from contrast-enhanced CT. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 236 patients with pathologically confirmed HCC. Tumor regions of interest were semi-automatically delineated on arterial-phase CT images, and slices centered on the largest tumor cross-section were sampled to build a 2.5D dataset. Four models—Transformer, MIL, CNN, and a clinical baseline—were trained. Models were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the DeLong test; bootstrap resampling assessed the stability of AUC estimates. Results The Transformer achieved the highest AUC of 0.827 (95% CI 0.7585–0.8962), with an accuracy of 0.775, sensitivity of 0.577, and specificity of 0.889, followed by MIL (0.766; 95% CI 0.6875–0.8441), CNN (0.723), and the clinical model (0.715). Bootstrap validation confirmed stable AUC estimates for all models, with the Transformer ranking first (mean 0.827; SD 0.034). The Transformer significantly outperformed the CNN (adjusted P = 0.001) and the clinical model (adjusted P = 0.039); after correction for multiple comparisons, its difference from MIL was of borderline significance (adjusted P = 0.097). No significant differences were observed among the CNN, MIL, and clinical models. Conclusion Among the four models evaluated, the contrast-enhanced CT-based Transformer predicted MVI most accurately, and its advantage persisted after bootstrap internal validation. These findings concern the ranking of discriminative performance only; the clinical utility of the model is not established, and prospective validation in larger cohorts is required before any clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: