Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To examine occupational conditions and sleep during wildfire response. Methods: We surveyed 90 first responders during the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires and modeled sleep duration, continuity, and quality against shift characteristics, workload, hazard proximity, and working conditions. Results: After adjustment for age and experience, 24-hour shifts were associated with 1.65 fewer total sleep hours (95% CI: −2.45, −0.84) and 1.93 fewer consecutive hours (−2.99, −0.87). Four or more consecutive shifts were also associated with shorter sleep, and poorer working conditions with shorter total sleep; hazard proximity and total shifts were not. Poor or very poor sleep quality (83%) was associated with all exposures except total shifts and shift extension. Conclusion: Long and consecutive shifts were associated with shorter, more fragmented sleep. Exposures were closely tied to occupational role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: