Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Peat soils present formidable challenges in geotechnical engineering due to extreme compressibility and pronounced secondary creep. Because conventional deterministic models struggle to predict this time-dependent deformation accurately while quantifying inherent uncertainties, this study introduces a novel hybrid numerical framework combining a fractional-order poro-viscoplastic model with a Bayesian Neural Network (BNN). Methodologically, the constitutive model integrates Modified Cam Clay (MCC) theory with a Caputo fractional derivative to capture the hereditary memory of peat creep. To overcome the limitations of circular calibration, this study proposes a rigorous Simulation-Based Inference (SBI) framework. The BNN is trained exclusively on 10,000 synthetic data points generated via forward fractional FEM simulations. Subsequently, empirical posterior inference is conducted using a dedicated laboratory dataset comprising 5000 observations from 50 independent oedometer creep tests on undisturbed Kampung Gajah peat. Finally, actual field monitoring data from a full-scale trial embankment is employed exclusively for independent predictive validation. Results demonstrate that the calibrated fractional order (α = 0.48) acts as a critical rheological interpolator; higher values (α = 0.8) simulate sustained viscous flow, whereas lower values (α = 0.2) trigger rapid elastic deceleration. Unlike standard integer-order frameworks like the Soft Soil Creep (SSC) model, this fractional formulation rigorously propagates the inferred epistemic uncertainties to generate a robust 2D long-term settlement forecast bounded by a 95% credible interval. Ultimately, this integration of probabilistic machine learning with fractional mechanics offers a highly robust, risk-informed forecasting tool for sustainable peatland infrastructure design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mamat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: