Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Obinutuzumab-based regimens are established frontline treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and prolonged administration increase patient burden and outpatient chair occupancy. Evidence on shortened obinutuzumab infusion in CLL remains limited. AIMS: To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of a 2-h obinutuzumab infusion protocol in treatment-naïve CLL. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 112 treatment-naïve patients receiving venetoclax-obinutuzumab (n = 72) or obinutuzumab-chlorambucil (n = 40). From cycle 1 day 8 onward, patients were managed according to either a shortened-infusion strategy (Short; n = 64) or a standard-duration strategy (Long; n = 48). The primary outcome was IRR incidence and severity; secondary outcomes included chair time, response rate, and progression-free survival. RESULTS: IRR rates did not differ significantly between the Short and Long groups (71.9% vs. 83.3%; odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-1.41; p = 0.18). Most IRRs occurred during the first infusion (87.4%), before implementation of the shortened protocol. Because cycle 1 day 1 and day 2 were administered using the same standard protocol in both groups, the safety comparison relevant to the shortened-infusion strategy begins at cycle 1 day 8; IRRs were infrequent from cycle 1 day 8 onward, and none occurred from cycle 1 day 15 onward, when eligible patients in the Short group were receiving the 2-h infusion. Grade 2 reactions predominated (91.6%); no Grade 4 IRRs occurred among the 112 patients included in the analysis. The shortened protocol saved 1.8 h per visit and 11.2 h per patient (42%). No apparent adverse signal in response or progression-free survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In frontline CLL care, a 2-h obinutuzumab infusion from cycle 1 day 8 was feasible, safe, and substantially reduced chair time, supporting its use to improve outpatient treatment efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Écsiová et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: