Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computed tomography (CT) is widely used to evaluate emergency department (ED) patients with headache, increasing costs, radiation exposure, and workload. Non-invasive intracranial pressure waveform (ICPW) monitoring has been proposed as an adjunctive triage tool. We assessed its diagnostic performance for identifying abnormal head CT findings in ED patients with red-flag headaches and explored potential resource implications. This retrospective study included 84 patients with red-flag headaches at Hospital Leforte Morumbi, Brazil (June–September 2023). All underwent non-invasive ICPW monitoring (brain4care System) and head CT during the same ED encounter. ICPW was abnormal if P2/P1 ≥ 1.2 or time-to-peak (TTP) ≥ 0.3. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated against abnormal CT. CT expenditure and ED length of stay were assessed as exploratory outcomes. ICPW showed 90.0% sensitivity, 66.2% specificity, 98.0% NPV, and 26.5% PPV for abnormal CT. Median P2/P1 ratio yielded an ROC AUC of 0.778 (95% CI 0.640–0.900). Forty-nine patients (58.3%) had both normal ICPW and normal CT; their median ED stay was 3.5 h shorter than that of the overall cohort, though causality cannot be inferred. One patient had normal ICPW despite abnormal CT. Hypothetically, the normal examinations represented a projected gross CT expenditure of US$34,300. The high NPV supports further investigation of ICPW as an adjunctive risk-stratification tool, but the retrospective single-center design, small sample, and few abnormal CTs preclude definitive conclusions. ICPW should not replace clinical assessment or neuroimaging; resource implications remain exploratory hypotheses requiring prospective, multicenter validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: