Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thermal processing inactivates foodborne bacteria but does not necessarily destroy their DNA, membrane vesicles, or bacteriophage particles. Such residues persist in pasteurized milk and heat-treated meat and are ingested by consumers. Whether this material can transfer antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) to gut bacteria remains untested: the only direct human evidence of foodborne resistance-gene transfer involved live bacteria, not material released from heat-killed cells. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on the post-thermal fate of extracellular DNA, membrane vesicles, and bacteriophages, grading that evidence explicitly from detection of a target sequence, through structural integrity, to demonstrated transfer under realistic conditions. Persistence of ARG sequences after pasteurization is well documented, whereas functional transfer from foodborne dead-cell material has not been demonstrated in vivo . A Genetic Legacy Index (GLI) is proposed as a conceptual measurement framework—not a validated index—combining extracellular DNA abundance, ARG load, and ARG–mobile genetic element linkage, with an illustrative formula, normalization strategy, and validation agenda. Current finished-product microbiological criteria are predominantly culture-based and do not establish limits for extracellular or dead-cell genetic material, although integrated antimicrobial resistance surveillance increasingly includes molecular detection and whole-genome sequencing. The GLI is therefore proposed as a research and surveillance tool rather than a product-release criterion: a first step toward evaluating an unquantified exposure pathway within One Health surveillance of the food chain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: