Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rice productivity is increasingly constrained by drought, salinity, heat, cold, submergence, heavy metal toxicity, and herbicide-related stresses. Although conventional breeding has improved stress tolerance, progress remains limited by the complex, polygenic, and environment-dependent nature of abiotic stress responses. Genome-editing technologies, including CRISPR/Cas systems, TALENs, ZFNs, base editors, prime editors, and CRISPR-Combo, provide precise approaches for modifying stress-responsive genes and regulatory pathways. This review summarizes recent genome-editing advances in rice for major abiotic stresses, highlighting validated targets involved in ROS homeostasis, ABA signaling, calcium/MAPK cascades, transcriptional regulation, ion transport, epigenetic control, and cross-stress signaling networks. It also discusses key limitations, including off-target effects, delivery constraints, low knock-in efficiency, genotype-dependent transformation, and regulatory challenges. Overall, genome editing offers a powerful strategy for developing climate-resilient rice cultivars, particularly when integrated with multiplex editing, precision allele engineering, and modern breeding approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khanal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: