Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose The aim of this qualitative study is to explore school principals’ perceptions of the social capital networks available to them and the forms of social support embedded within these relationships. A further aim is to examine the interplay between these two social dimensions. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 Finnish principals from both rural and urban schools and analysed using theory-guided content analysis informed by the concepts of internal and external social capital and emotional, informational and instrumental support. Findings The findings suggest that principals’ internal social capital was a key source of emotional reassurance, practical help and everyday problem-solving. External social capital was more ambivalent: professional principal networks were highly valued, whereas limited resources, top-down demands and fragmented cooperation with external partners and services generated strain. Further, while social capital emerged as a structural precondition for accessing support, its value depended on reciprocity, resourcing and contextual fit. Providing adequate support therefore requires shifting the focus from individual resilience and coping to strengthening the relational structures around principals through shared leadership and internal team structures, well-resourced peer networks and external services and ensuring that new demands are matched with adequate resources. Originality/value By integrating social capital and social support to uncover how principals’ networks function differently depending on contextual factors, this study demonstrates that relational resources support leadership when they are well-resourced, reciprocal and well-aligned with local needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elomaa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: