Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: SMARCB1 (INI-1)–deficient myoepithelial carcinoma of soft tissue is an exceptionally rare and aggressive pediatric neoplasm. Although epithelial in origin, these tumors display sarcoma-like behavior and often arise in the head and neck, where complete surgical excision can be technically challenging. Here, we present a complex case where multidisciplinary management was necessary for a complete tumor resection utilizing a novel mandibulotomy approach to help achieve an R0 tumor resection. Case Description: A 3-year-old female presented with progressive left neck swelling, with imaging demonstrating a 5.6 cm retropharyngeal mass displacing the carotid space. An open biopsy revealed a SMARCB1 (INI-1)–deficient myoepithelial carcinoma, confirmed through molecular testing and secondary review at an outside research hospital. PET-CT showed no evidence of metastatic disease. The patient underwent 6 cycles of modified CHOP-based chemotherapy (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) with a near-complete metabolic response. Definitive surgical management included radical tumor resection requiring a stair-step mandibulotomy with selective neck dissection and carotid artery resection following preoperative embolization. Tracheostomy and gastrostomy were performed concurrently. Facial, vagus, and hypoglossal nerves were preserved. Postoperatively, the patient had a left-sided stroke requiring physiotherapy and speech-language therapy, but now has almost complete recovery. Adjuvant proton beam radiotherapy was added to the current chemotherapy. The patient continues with follow-up, demonstrating good outcomes and tolerating the treatment. Conclusion: This case illustrates the diagnostic and surgical complexities of SMARCB1-deficient myoepithelial carcinoma in the pediatric parapharyngeal space. Early multidisciplinary collaboration and tailored multimodal therapy are critical to optimizing outcomes while preserving neurovascular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bharathan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: