Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPA) learn representations by predicting the embedding of a target view from a context view, which makes them prone to representation collapse. Several stabilizers have been proposed, including exponential moving averages (EMA), variance-invariance-covariance regularization (VICReg), and isotropic Gaussian regularization (SIGReg). Comparisons in the literature often rely on single runs and differ in training budget. We propose a controlled protocol that compares these three stabilizers under identical architectures, budgets, and at least five random seeds, and that measures collapse with an intrinsic-dimension estimate on known synthetic manifolds and on sentence-embedding benchmarks. On synthetic manifolds, all three methods recover low intrinsic dimensions, but all underestimate at d=32, where VICReg retains the most embedding rank. Vision and language results are pending. Preprint. Results in this version come from small-scale pilot experiments; the full experimental protocol is described in the text and is pending.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dheiver Francisco Santos (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: