Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Routine road traffic noise assessment describes the source by traffic volume, speed and vehicle-category shares, whereas monitoring usually reports a measured source-side level with a total vehicle count only, so that the operating conditions behind that level remain unidentified. This paper addresses that gap with a multi-city field study of 25 urban road sections in Guangzhou, China, covering four road classes and three operating periods. Each section-period was measured three times for 20 min with Class 1 instrumentation and counted by vehicle class, giving 75 observations analyzed with an explicit metrological and statistical treatment. Levels ranged from 58.5 to 79.8 dB(A); arterial sections alone spanned 15.0 dB(A) and night-time measurements 21.3 dB(A). Vehicle-class flow was more strongly associated with L A e q than average speed, medium-vehicle flow showing the strongest association ( r = 0.867, 95 % CI 0.797-0.914). The expanded uncertainty of a single level was about 0.8 dB ( k = 2). The results support recording vehicle-class counts alongside L A e q , so that a measured level can be attributed to traffic volume, fleet composition or both.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: