Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To observe changes in axial length (AL), spherical equivalent refraction (SE), and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in children aged 7–12 years with myopia following repeated low-level red-light therapy with single-vision spectacles (RLRL + SVS); and to compare axial elongation control among the RLRL + SVS, highly aspherical lenslet target (HALT) spectacles, and SVS-alone groups. In this retrospective, non-randomized study, a total of 101 children with myopia were categorized into three groups: RLRL + SVS ( n = 36), HALT ( n = 38), and SVS ( n = 27). AL in the RLRL + SVS group was observed before and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment; SE and SFCT were measured before and at 6 months; and AL in the HALT and SVS groups was measured before and at 6 months. In the RLRL + SVS group, AL decreased from baseline at 1 and 3 months post-treatment ( P < 0.001), with no difference at 6 months ( P = 0.230). At 6 months, SE changed from − 2.40 ± 1.02 D to − 2.27 ± 1.05 D, and SFCT increased from 234.87 ± 40.57 μm to 253.86 ± 45.34 μm; both changes were statistically significant. Mean AL changes from baseline to 6 months were − 0.03 ± 0.11, 0.02 ± 0.14, and 0.22 ± 0.12 mm in the RLRL + SVS, HALT, and SVS groups, respectively ( P < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons showed no difference between the RLRL + SVS and HALT groups ( P = 0.270) but both differed from the SVS group ( P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in AL control was observed between the RLRL + SVS and HALT groups at 6 months. Repeated RLRL therapy plus SVS for 6 months effectively controlled myopia progression in school-age children with no ocular adverse events observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: