Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study learned scores for the critically damped Langevin (CLD) flow with an isotropic noise schedule specified by its marginals, added in a rescaled metric Y = PZ. The standard CLD, with velocity-only noise given by its SDE, does not show the failures studied here. On a four-dimensional Gaussian mixture, from 28 networks and pre-registered tests, we report two results and a partial mechanism. First, a Heun-type integrator of the corrected reverse SDE, with a learned score and no retraining, reaches a median |L| ≤ 0.083 at 281 steps in all four metrics tested, where Euler–Maruyama gives 0.42–0.55; at 140 steps it no longer suffices. Second, the learned probability-flow ODE broke for 10 of 12 networks with P = I (κ_P = 2 > r = 1) and for 3 of 16 with metrics of κ_P ≤ 0; at the network level only one pre-registered comparison was significant. Broken runs contain at most 0.12% outliers: a few tail trajectories, which start in the tail of the prior and pick up most of their deviation while σ is large, fly far at the end. Thirteen of nineteen pre-registered predictions failed; we report all of them. This paper continues "When the blur is slower than the flow" (paper G, doi:10.5281/zenodo.23689912). Code, the 28 trained networks, stored results, pre-registration files and verification: https://github.com/neginyan/cld-learned-score-samplers (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23898962).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taishi Namba (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: