Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Precise mixed-crop recommendation is essential for increasing agricultural productivity, improving land utilization, and supporting sustainable farming. Effective crop combinations depend on several environmental and soil factors, making accurate recommendations a challenging task. This study compared classical and hybrid machine learning approaches for mixed-crop recommendation using an indigenous dataset from Andhra Pradesh, India. The dataset consisted of seven key features: nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, temperature, humidity, pH, and rainfall. The study evaluated Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Extra Trees (ET), alongside a proposed hybrid Random Forest-Extra Trees (RF-ET) model. Performance was measured using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, k-fold cross-validation, and confusion matrix analysis. The results show that the proposed hybrid RF-ET model achieved the best performance, obtaining 95.91% accuracy, 95.98% precision, 95.91% recall, and 95.94% F1-score. The model also demonstrated strong robustness through cross-validation. These findings indicate that hybrid machine learning can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of mixed-crop recommendation systems, providing farmers with better decision-support tools for sustainable and efficient agricultural production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gimba et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: