Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Working paper, not peer reviewed. Nothing in this record is field-validated. Scope and novelty. Project P2 re-proves the formal cores of Viridis OS decision kernels so that anyone can re-check them with the current public Lean 4 toolchain. These are classical, elementary results, not new theorems: the first, Carbon Continuity, is the 2x2 case of the Collatz-Wielandt characterisation of the Perron root of a nonnegative matrix (A. Berman and R. J. Plemmons, Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences, SIAM 1994, doi:10.1137/1.9781611971262). Each result holds only inside its stated model. It says nothing about coefficient values for any site, whether deployed kernel code implements the rule faithfully, or any carbon-credit or treatment outcome. Viridis OS runs decision kernels whose formal cores were checked by tools that can no longer be re-run. This program restates each kernel's formal core as a sealed, self-contained Lean 4 statement and re-proves it under a pinned toolchain (Lean v4.28.0, Mathlib 8f9d9cff). This revision treats the Restoration kernel, which decides whether a planted cluster on degraded land is large enough to grow into forest. Its formal core is the classical-nucleation cubic G(r) = -Delta mu r^3 + a sigma r^2 in the cube-root order parameter r = n^(1/3). We give a Lean proof of the sealed statement P2.Restoration. For positive Delta mu, a and sigma, the critical radius r* = 2 a sigma/(3 Delta mu) is positive and is the unique maximiser of G on r >= 0. For positive Delta mu, the barrier satisfies G(r*) = (1/2) Delta mu (r*)^3. The proof is a restructured port of the archived canon proof and rests on the factorisation G(r*) - G(r) = Delta mu (r - r*)^2 (r + r*/2). We also observe that the canon proof replays verbatim under the pinned toolchain, and that the half-barrier identity does not need its positivity hypothesis. We set out what the theorem settles, namely the go/no-go geometry inside the model, and what it leaves to field evidence: the parameter values, the adequacy of classical nucleation theory for tree-cluster establishment, nucleation rates and stochastic establishment, the seed-allocation result in the same canon file, and conformance of the deployed code. The earlier Carbon Continuity result and the three statement proposals are retained. Verification. a Lean 4 proof of P2.Restoration, a statement fixed before the proof attempt, machine-checked against Mathlib and replayed through the Lean kernel using only the standard axioms Run record, certification page and reproducible package: https://github.com/jdhart81/viridis-research/tree/main/runs/2026-10-31_P2 AI use: this version was drafted by an AI research agent (Claude, by Anthropic) running the Viridis research engine. Formal claims are checked by the Lean 4 kernel and labelled by an automated verifier. Justin D. Hart directs the research and is the accountable author. No AI system is listed as an author.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Justin Hart (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: