Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This repository contains the technical preprint and formal verification modules addressing systems security, AI interpretability, and algorithmic safety frameworks for independent human rights research. Abstract This paper presents a formal computational mechanism isolating verified software architectures from ungrounded jargon and documents infrastructure dependencies for independent researchers, featuring a computer-checked Coq verification module (JargonFilter) that proves zero-leakage safety boundaries. It moves past prior high-dimensional formulations of "Kinetic Collapse," addresses cognitive prosthetics for neurodivergent thinkers, and supports deterministic neurosymbolic sandboxing under International Humanitarian Law (IHL). Key Contributions • The Infrastructure Deficit Framework: An analysis of operational constraints faced by sovereign researchers using LLMs as cognitive prosthetics. • Formal Jargon Filtering Enclave: A Coq implementation (Module JargonFilter) proving a strict safety invariant theorem (zero_jargon_leakage) for AI outputs. • Ethical & Legal Safeguards: Alignment of autonomous decision boundaries with International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and a non-weaponization mandate. https://github.com/Borealiscodes/CoQ-Hallucination-Guard/tree/84fb58ac7688fd8d2913d76300653a31cf970aac
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hedling Borealis (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: