Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Power-operating-point tracking in permanent-magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) wind energy conversion systems is challenged by coupled mechanical/aerodynamic and electromagnetic uncertainties together with converter current and voltage limits. This study develops a data-model fusion-based dual radial-basis-function neural network (RBFNN) adaptive backstepping controller for below-rated operation. A dimensional turbine-PMSG model supplies wind-dependent references, while two channel-specific RBFNNs estimate lumped residual effects in the mechanical and q-axis voltage dynamics. The design combines constraint-aware adaptation, current and voltage limiters, and offline Harris hawks optimization of five gains. A complete closed-loop boundedness analysis gives explicit ultimate bounds and conditional damping margins for the adopted model. Five controller configurations (M0-M4) were compared using three optimizer seeds, five held-out simulation seeds, and nine parameter-drift and measurement-noise conditions. Under the main condition, M3 achieved a power root-mean-square error of 382.320 ± 28.187 kW, representing reductions of 28.07%, 16.13%, 18.20%, and 19.02% relative to M0, M1, M2, and M4, respectively. M3 also attained the lowest power error in all 45 seed-condition cells. The observer-assisted M4 yielded a slightly lower speed error than M3 (0.023193 ± 0.004554 versus 0.024266 ± 0.004714 p.u.). A source-derived adaptive sliding-mode comparator further supports the power-tracking benefit under matched implementation conditions. Here, ± denotes the sample standard deviation across five held-out seeds. These repeated simulations show that the proposed controller provides a consistent power-tracking advantage and balanced constrained performance within the modeled operating envelope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: