Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mining is central to many Latin American economies, but its relationship with climate-related international migration remains insufficiently understood. We compare agricultural and mineral indicators in an instrumental-variable framework using a 17-country panel, with baseline estimation samples covering 1970–2017. Countries are stratified by multidimensional poverty, and climate exposure is aggregated under six spatial weighting schemes. Under maintained exclusion restrictions, a 1% contraction in mineral rents or depletion is associated with about 0.21% higher emigration in the higher-poverty stratum. The baseline estimate is significant at 10% under country-clustered wild-bootstrap- t inference and depends materially on Bolivia. Inference accommodating both weak identification and few countries does not establish its sign or magnitude. Pooled and middle-income estimates are smaller and sensitive to the instrument set; a between-stratum difference is not established. On a common sample and design, tests reject signed equality between agricultural and mining composite estimands under the reported family-wise adjustments. These comparisons do not establish the population ordering of absolute elasticities or the relative strength of separate causal channels. Baseline control and country-exclusion checks preserve the mining sign, while price-control specifications reveal weak conditional identification and imprecise positive estimates. The results support a descriptive comparison of climate-related mobility and sectoral income indicators, with explicit limits for causal and policy interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: