Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between Preventive Health and Health Services (PHHS) Block Grant (BG) funding and population health outcomes. DESIGN: A state-level panel data set (2000-2019) for 50 US states was compiled from USA Spending, PHHS BG administrative system, US Census Bureau, and America's Health Rankings. The long-term population health outcome was years of life lost (YLL), measured as deaths before age 75 years per 100 000 population. We used a generalized method of moments (GMM), along with a Koyck distributed lag model and a 2-way fixed-effects approach, to assess the impact of PHHS BG funding on YLL. We also provided several sensitivity analyses. SETTING: This study examines the effects of PHHS Block Grant flexible funding on the population health outcomes during the period of 2000-2019. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty US States were included in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: YLL before age 75, per 100 000 population. RESULTS: During 2000-2019, a $1 per capita increase in PHHS BG funding was associated with a 1.5%-11% reduction in YLL (110-832 fewer years lost per 100 000 population). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing use of PHHS BG funds is associated with substantial years of life savings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sotnikov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: