Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim: Leaf size and shape are key character for assessing photosynthesis, growth, genetic diversity, and plant health. Manual measurement is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and error-prone, particularly in large-scale phenotyping studies. This study aimed to develop QuickLeaf-LWA, a software tool for rapid, precise, and automated estimation of leaf size (length and width) and shape (aspect ratio) from digital images. Methodology: QuickLeaf-LWA integrates high-throughput automation (HTA) with comprehensive trait management and morphological analysis workflows. The software employs a robust image-processing pipeline using adaptive threshold for accurate leaf segmentation from complex backgrounds, followed by morphological operations to reduce noise. Leaf dimensions and aspect ratio are calculated using a rectangular-bounded, radially rotated image approach. Results: Accuracy assessment showed low mean error rates (0.584–3.283%) and high accuracy (96.717–99.416%). Root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) values were low (0.150–0.564 and 0.082–0.476, respectively), with strong correlations to manual measurements (R2 ≥ 0.96). Interpretation: QuickLeaf-LWA enables rapid analysis of hundreds of leaves within minutes offers an intuitive interface with batch-processing capability, making it a practical tool for plant physiology, genetics, agriculture, horticulture, and leaf phenotyping research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: