Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) pulp is a promising source of natural pigments with potential applications as food colorants. This study evaluated three extraction methods and the sensory acceptance of pumpkin-derived pigments in ice cream. Methods Maceration, Soxhlet extraction, and supercritical CO 2 extraction were compared in terms of extraction yield, total carotenoid and flavonoid contents, and DPPH antioxidant activity expressed as IC 50 . Analytical determinations were performed in triplicate. Extraction methods were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test. The Soxhlet extract was selected for ice cream formulation, which was evaluated by 100 untrained adult panelists using a five-point hedonic scale. Sensory data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn–Bonferroni comparisons. Results Supercritical CO 2 extraction resulted in the highest carotenoid content (315.22 ± 0.01 mg kg −1 ) and total flavonoid content (1099.08 ± 0.04 mg QE kg −1 extract). Soxhlet extraction achieved the highest extraction yield (22.72 ± 0.33%) and the lowest IC 50 value (1.06 ± 0.035 mg/mL). The formulation containing 600 mg of extract per 600 g of ice cream (Z3) showed the highest color acceptance. Significant differences were detected for color (p < 0.05), but not for odor, flavor, or texture (p > 0.05). Discussion The extraction method affected both extraction yield and the measured characteristics of the pumpkin extracts. The results support the potential of pumpkin-derived pigments as natural food colorants, although further work is needed to evaluate their performance and stability in the final food matrix.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quijije et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: