Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Against digital education background, generative AI has become common writing assistance for undergraduates. Existing studies mainly focus on second-language writing and ignore stratified comparisons across learners, while the dual effects of AI on academic writing self-efficacy remain understudied. Based on self-efficacy theory, this paper distributes questionnaires and divides respondents into three proficiency groups by CET-4 scores. Descriptive statistics, group difference tests and correlation analysis are adopted for empirical analysis. The results reveal prevalent AI over-dependence despite its polishing functions. Participants’ writing self-efficacy stays at medium-upper level yet hampered by writing anxiety. AI delivers short-term confidence promotion but impairs independent writing competence in the long run, with stronger influences on low-proficiency students. This stratified dual-path framework offers empirical references for standardized AI application in university writing teaching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minming Gong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: