Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Small hydropower can provide a comparatively persistent renewable‐electricity profile for water electrolysis, but electrolyzer sizing requires a compromise between renewable‐energy capture and equipment utilization. This study evaluates a planned green‐hydrogen system at Miryang Dam, Republic of Korea, using 26,280 h of measured generation data from two 650 kW units during 2021–2023. A 1 MW PEM electrolyzer was simulated by hourly load following, and capacities from 300 to 1200 kW were screened using an equal‐weight ideal‐point criterion and marginal hydrogen‐production gain. The planned 1 MW configuration captured 98.11% of available hydropower energy, achieved a 59.93% capacity factor, and produced 93.75 t‐H 2 /year. The criterion identified 600 kW as the technically balanced capacity, with 84.71% capture, 86.25% capacity factor, and 80.95 t‐H 2 /year. Incremental hydrogen gain declined from 7.03 t/year for the 500–600 kW increase to 3.82 t/year for 600–700 kW. At a PPA price of KRW 160/kWh, audited operating and full LCOH were KRW 20,137/kg‐H 2 and 27,209/kg‐H 2 . The results show that sizing based solely on peak hydropower output can overestimate the electrolyzer capacity required for efficient system utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: