Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Gender disparities in science participation may emerge before learners enter upper secondary school; however, evidence on female students’ intentions to continue studying science in Tanzania remains limited. Aim: The study aimed to explore factors associated with female students’ intention to continue studying science in lower secondary schools in the Dodoma and Mwanza regions of Tanzania. Study Design: The study used a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, combining quantitative and qualitative evidence. Place and Duration of Study: It was conducted in six lower secondary schools in the Dodoma and Mwanza regions of Tanzania between January and March 2026. Methodology: A total of 150 female students participated in the study, representing a 100% response rate, and 20 of the 25 invited teachers (80.0% response rate) completed the study. A validated questionnaire with a Likert scale was used to gather quantitative data. Intention to continue studying science was measured using the statement: “When I am given a choice of subjects, I intend to continue studying science subjects,” rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The responses were dichotomised as intention to continue (agree/strongly agree) or no intention to continue (neutral/disagree/strongly disagree). Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression with school-clustered (robust) standard errors. Semi-structured interviews and structured classroom observations were conducted to collect qualitative data and were then analysed thematically. Results: Overall, 105 students (70.0%) intended to continue studying science and 45 students (30.0%) did not intend to continue studying science. Overall, 68% reported one or more barriers to ongoing participation in science. Teachers' expectations (M = 3.42, SD = 0.61), gendered classroom practices (M = 3.28, SD = 0.55), and perceived assessment bias (M = 3.15, SD = 0.58) had the highest mean barrier scores. In the cluster-adjusted analysis, science self-efficacy (aOR = 2.31, 95% CI [1.48, 3.61]) and family support for STEM (aOR = 2.46, 95% CI [1.51, 4.01]) had positive associations, while science-continuation intention (aOR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.25, 0.74]) had a negative association. Five themes emerged: gendered expectations, assessment practices seen as favouring boys, limited female role models, peer influence, and home environment. Conclusions: Female students’ intention to continue studying science was associated with institutional, pedagogical, social and cultural factors. The results highlight the need for multilevel interventions that tackle teacher attitudes, gender-inclusive classroom and assessment practices, the visibility of female scientists in students’ environments and family engagement to support female students’ sustained engagement in science.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivy Bimbiga (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: