Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To compare ultra-micro angiography (UMA) modalities-color (cUMA), power (pUMA), and subtraction UMA (sUMA)-with conventional color Doppler (CD) and power Doppler (PD) in hepatic hemangiomas, and to identify factors limiting flow detectability, including lesion depth, size, and steatosis. METHODS: In this prospective single-center study, hemangiomas confirmed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging underwent B-mode ultrasound, CD, PD, and 3 UMA modes. Vascularity was graded with the Adler scale (0-3), and the vascular index measured for each modality. Steatosis was graded visually and quantified by ultrasound attenuation (USAT). Groups with and without flow were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test; predictors of detectability were assessed by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Of 138 hemangiomas in 81 patients, 124 were analyzed; flow was detected in 89 (71.8%). Flow-positive hemangiomas were shallower (44.67 versus 87.06 mm) and larger (29.53 versus 17.89 mm; p < .001 for both). Depth was the strongest predictor (area under the ROC curve 0.904; cutoff 59 mm), followed by size (0.710) and USAT (0.612); moderate and severe steatosis (grades 2 and 3) independently reduced detection (p ≤ .045). Adler grade 2 or higher was present in 65-73% of hemangiomas on UMA versus 21-24% on conventional Doppler (p < .001). Strip rim (30.3%) and peripheral dot-like (23.6%) patterns predominated; interobserver agreement was good (κ = 0.748). CONCLUSIONS: UMA outperforms conventional Doppler in hepatic hemangiomas; depth, small size, and moderate-to-severe steatosis limit signal detection, and peripheral microvascular patterns parallel the globular enhancement on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aşiret et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: