Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spark-ignition engines remain widely used in passenger cars, motorcycles, hybrid vehicles, and light-duty transport, making fuel flexibility and emission reduction important during the transition to low-carbon mobility. Methanol-gasoline blends have attracted attention as alternative fuels because methanol has high oxygen content, high octane quality, strong charge-cooling capacity, and flexible production routes.This review summarizes recent progress in methanol-gasoline blends for spark-ignition engines, covering fuel properties, blending ratios, combustion behavior, engine performance, regulated and unregulated emissions, life-cycle impacts, and application prospects. The literature shows that methanol addition can enhance knock resistance, promote oxygenated combustion, reduce soot-forming tendency, and support higher compression ratios, optimized ignition timing, and lean-burn operation. However, its lower energy density increases fuel consumption, while water affinity, phase separation, cold-start difficulty, corrosion, and material compatibility remain key barriers. Emission responses are strongly condition-dependent. CO and particulate emissions are often reduced, whereas HC and NOx vary with operating condition, mixture preparation, injection strategy, and after-treatment performance. Formaldehyde, unburned methanol, and cold-start oxygenated emissions require further attention. Life-cycle benefits depend mainly on methanol production pathways. Low-level blends are more suitable for near-term use in existing engines, while higher blends require optimized engines, compatible fuel systems, green methanol supply, infrastructure readiness, and cost reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: