Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines the association between AI-based classroom planning and classroom climate and English as a foreign language (EFL) achievement among 240 secondary school students in West Bengal, India, with student engagement as a mediating variable. A single-group pretest–posttest design was employed across a three-week AI-supported intervention. Using SPSS 26 and AMOS 26, paired-sample t tests revealed statistically significant pre to-post improvements in classroom climate (t(239) = −76.90, p < .001, d = −4.96), student engagement (t(239) = −64.46, p < .001, d = −4.16), and EFL achievement (t(239) = −61.77, p < .001, d = −3.99). These effect sizes are unusually large and should be interpreted cautiously given the single-group design, short intervention duration, and potential testing and novelty effects. Structural equation modeling (SEM) confirmed partial mediation via student engagement (β = .479, p = .001, 95% CI [.320, .641]), explaining 63.3% of the variance in EFL achievement. These findings offer a scalable, evidence-based model for AI-supported language pedagogy in underresourced, multilingual EFL contexts in the Global South.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Majumder et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: