Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Operational and environmental variability complicate long-term monitoring of publicly accessible heritage timber buildings, while local visitor activity and member-level hygrothermal conditions are difficult to observe continuously. Using field data from Xuankong Temple, this study develops a task-specific framework to evaluate three site-level information sources: opening and closure records for organizing vibration references, entrance counts for estimating open-period vibration responses, and ambient environmental measurements for assessing cross-period tilt baselines. Robustness tests, incremental generalized additive models with date substitution, and time-ordered frozen-model evaluation were used to assess the three tasks. Open-to-closure ratios of three-axis resultant root-mean-square (RMS) acceleration were 13.331, 17.872, and 1.195 at the North Building, Boardwalk, and South Building, respectively; this spatial contrast persisted across robustness tests. Entrance counts improved follow-up log-RMS estimation at all three nodes (ΔR2 = 0.132–0.364), with the clearest original-date advantage at the North Building. Temperature history improved development-period tilt estimation; frozen environmental–tilt models showed no consistent advantage over a fixed mean-tilt reference based on the final seven development days. This framework links site-level information to monitoring decisions, providing an evidence-based approach to organizing vibration references, selecting auxiliary variables, and identifying when finer local observations are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: