Key result
Social-biological time misalignment shows a ~9.7-fold interaction with final infarct volume on 90-day post-thrombectomy recovery.
Why the study?
Functional recovery after endovascular thrombectomy remains heterogeneous despite high rates of reperfusion, and it was unknown whether social-biological time misalignment modifies the association between final infarct volume and 90-day functional outcome.
Does social-biological time misalignment modify the association between final infarct volume and 90-day favorable functional outcome (mRS 0–2) in patients with acute large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy?
Cohort (n=160)
Two researchers blinded to clinical outcomes coded occupational descriptions; two radiologists blinded to clinical information and exposure grouping calculated final infarct volume
No
Does social-biological time misalignment modify the association between final infarct volume and 90-day favorable functional outcome (mRS 0–2) in patients with acute large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy?
Social-biological time misalignment acts as a state-dependent modifier that significantly alters the prognostic relationship between final infarct volume and 90-day functional recovery after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Social-biological misalignment may modify infarct volume prognostic value after thrombectomy; leaves open whether alignment-targeted interventions improve recovery.
Objective Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) achieves high rates of reperfusion, yet functional recovery remains heterogeneous. We investigated whether social-biological time misalignment modifies the association between final infarct volume and 90-day functional outcome. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 160 patients with large vessel occlusion treated with EVT. Misalignment was quantified using a composite score incorporating occupational shift exposure and symptom onset timing. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the interaction between misalignment and final infarct volume on favorable 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–2). Results Misalignment was not independently associated with favorable outcome. However, a significant interaction was observed (OR = 9.70, 95% CI 1.74–54.10, LRT p = 0.008), remaining significant after FDR correction ( q = 0.034), stable across profile likelihood and Firth penalized regression. The interaction improved model fit (AIC 124.35 → 119.38) and provided modest incremental net benefit. Exploratory threshold analysis suggested a potential inflection point approximating 25 mL, but this is hypothesis-generating and requires validation. Conclusion Misalignment does not exert a uniform adverse effect but acts as a state-dependent modifier, modifying the association between final infarct volume and favorable outcome. The interaction between chronobiological state and infarct burden offers a novel framework for understanding outcome heterogeneity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) (n=160). Social-biological time misalignment × final infarct volume interaction (Social-Biological Time Misalignment Score ≥1 combining high occupational shift exposure and nighttime symptom onset 18:00–06:00) vs. Social-biological time aligned (Misalignment Score = 0) was evaluated on Favorable 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2) evaluated via the multiplicative interaction between standardized social-biological misalignment score and standardized final infarct volume (OR 9.70, 95% CI 1.74-54.10, p=0.008). Social-biological time misalignment significantly modified the association between final infarct volume and 90-day mRS 0–2 after thrombectomy (interaction OR 9.70, 95% CI 1.74–54.10, p=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: