Key result
Myeloid osteopontin, fibroblast NLRP3, and cardiomyocyte calcium promote AF, but a unified circuit remains unproven.
Why the study?
Hypertension is a major antecedent of atrial fibrillation, but pressure load alone does not explain the development of an arrhythmogenic atrial substrate. This review examines myeloid-fibroblast-cardiomyocyte crosstalk across experimental models and human atrial tissue to separate demonstrated findings from proposed relevance to hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review synthesizes experimental and human tissue evidence on myeloid-fibroblast-cardiomyocyte crosstalk in atrial fibrillation, emphasizing that while immune and inflammatory pathways promote fibrotic and electrical remodeling across various models, a complete three-cell causal circuit specific to hypertension remains unproven and requires blood-pressure-matched, spatially resolved studies.
Hypertension is a major antecedent of atrial fibrillation, but pressure load alone does not explain the development of an arrhythmogenic atrial substrate. Wall stress and neurohumoral activation can recruit circulating myeloid cells, alter macrophage states, activate fibroblasts, and disrupt cardiomyocyte inflammatory signaling and calcium handling. This review examines evidence from hypertensive animals, mixed-risk-factor models, human atrial tissue, and non-hypertensive models, separating findings demonstrated in each setting from their proposed relevance to hypertension. Macrophage osteopontin promotes fibroblast matrix programs in mixed-risk-factor models. Fibroblast-restricted NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation promotes fibrosis and conduction abnormalities in a non-hypertensive model. Separate experiments link cardiomyocyte NLRP3 or N-terminal gasdermin D signaling to inflammatory output and arrhythmogenic remodeling. These mechanisms may converge, but neither a serial osteopontin–fibroblast NLRP3 pathway nor a complete three-cell causal circuit has been established in hypertension. Blood-pressure-matched experiments, spatially resolved human atrial studies, and interventions that distinguish recruited pathological states from resident reparative macrophages are needed to test these links. Such studies may identify the disease stages and cell states in which immune modulation can complement control of hemodynamic stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bi et al. (2026) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Hypertension-induced mechanical and neurohumoral stress vs. Normotensive or non-hypertensive models was evaluated on Atrial fibrosis, conduction abnormalities, and atrial fibrillation susceptibility. Myeloid osteopontin, fibroblast NLRP3, and cardiomyocyte calcium signaling promote atrial fibrillation across models, but a unified three-cell causal circuit in hypertension remains unproven.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: