Key result
Dobutamine-milrinone escalation linked to ~2.7-fold higher ICVCU costs vs monotherapy.
Why the study?
Adding milrinone to dobutamine in cardiogenic shock is reimbursed for a limited duration under Indonesian national health insurance, but the cost structure of escalation and the contribution of drug acquisition were poorly characterized.
Does dobutamine–milrinone escalation increase intensive cardiovascular care unit and total hospital costs compared to dobutamine monotherapy in adult cardiogenic shock survivors?
Cohort (n=76)
No
Does dobutamine–milrinone escalation increase intensive cardiovascular care unit and total hospital costs compared to dobutamine monotherapy in adult cardiogenic shock survivors?
Although adding milrinone to dobutamine in cardiogenic shock is associated with more than double the ICVCU and total hospital costs, inotrope drug acquisition accounts for only 4.3% of ICVCU expenditure, supporting severity- and resource-based reimbursement rather than duration limits on individual drugs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May prompt cost scrutiny of escalation protocols in cardiogenic shock; leaves open causal effects and optimal strategies pending prospective trials.
Adding milrinone to dobutamine (dobutamine–milrinone escalation) in cardiogenic shock (CS) is reimbursed for a limited duration under Indonesia’s national health insurance, but the cost structure of escalation remains poorly characterized. This study quantified direct medical charges associated with escalation and the contribution of drug acquisition. Retrospective cohort of 76 adult CS survivors (20 escalation, 56 dobutamine monotherapy) at Indonesia’s national cardiovascular referral center, 2020–2024. Covariate Balancing Propensity Score–based inverse probability of treatment weighting, using pre-treatment covariates, estimated adjusted cost ratios (CR) for intensive cardiovascular care unit (ICVCU) and total hospital costs from institutional billing records. Escalation was associated with higher ICVCU costs (CR 2.711; 95% CI 1.912–3.844; p < 0.001) and total hospital costs (CR 2.321; 95% CI 1.372–3.929; p = 0.002). Combined inotrope costs represented 4.3% of ICVCU expenditure in the escalation group, compared with 30.9% for therapeutic and interventional procedures. Baseline vasoactive-inotropic score correlated with total hospital cost (ρ=0.597; p < 0.001). Drug acquisition represented a minor share of costs associated with dobutamine–milrinone escalation. The findings support consideration of severity- and resource-based approaches to reimbursement rather than focusing solely on duration limits for individual inotropes. Interpretation is limited by the retrospective, single-center, survivor-only design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Respaty et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiogenic shock (n=76). Dobutamine-milrinone escalation vs. Dobutamine monotherapy was evaluated on Intensive cardiovascular care unit (ICVCU) and total hospital costs (CR 2.711, 95% CI 1.912-3.844, p=<0.001). Dobutamine-milrinone escalation increased ICVCU costs vs monotherapy (CR 2.711; 95% CI 1.912-3.844; p<0.001), with inotropes accounting for 4.3% of ICVCU expenditure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: