Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The growing demand for high-quality liquid products, such as liquor and perfume, has intensified liquid counterfeiting, causing economic losses and potential health risks. Existing liquid authentication methods often rely on intrusive sensors, radio-frequency signals, or cameras, making them difficult to deploy conveniently and non-invasively in everyday settings. This paper presents ASLiquid+, a liquid counterfeit identification system that uses low-cost commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) acoustic devices, such as standard earphones. By placing a speaker and a microphone on opposite sides of a container, ASLiquid+ excites the liquid-container system and captures acoustic spectra that encode liquid density and solute composition through resonance and interface absorption effects. To make such sensing practical,ASLiquid^+$addresses three key challenges: hardware heterogeneity among acoustic devices, variability in user operations, and data complexity caused by changing device placements and liquid volumes. Specifically, it introduces a hardware-independent normalization method to suppress circuit noise and compensate for frequency-response differences, a user operation adaptation algorithm to extract robust frames from manual measurements, and a conditional variational autoencoder (CVAE)-based framework for data augmentation and anomaly detection under diverse physical states. We implementASLiquid^+$as an interactive smartphone application and evaluate it with six COTS earphones and a low-cost DIY acoustic device. Experiments show F1 scores of 96.0%–99.1% across five common counterfeit detection tasks and 93.3% under additional liquid-volume variations.ASLiquid^+$can also distinguish liquids with a 1% mass-fraction difference and identify solutions with identical densities but different chemical compositions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: