Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chemical communication via scent-marks is widely recognized as a key mediator of sexual selection in lizards, yet it remains poorly understood how scent-mark composition ultimately impacts male fitness in nature. Male scent-marks are often proposed to function as condition-dependent honest sexual signals mediating female choice, but an alternative hypothesis is that they primarily function and have evolved in the context of male–male competition. We provide a comprehensive test of these competing hypotheses. We studied common wall lizards (Podarcis muralis) in outdoor enclosures and combined chemical analyses of scent-marks with detailed behavioural and spatial data, genetic parentage assignment and path analysis to quantify how scent-mark composition relates to mating behaviour, contest outcomes, sperm competition and male reproductive success. We found no evidence that females assess mates based on candidate compounds proposed as signals of male quality. Instead, female settlement and fertilization patterns were driven by resource distribution and spatial proximity. Furthermore, several compounds correlated with dominance, and male–male competition emerged as the primary driver of reproductive success, strongly suggesting that scent-marks mediate territorial dynamics, rather than female choice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ábalos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: