Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Closed-to-open cell mixed-phase cloud transitions within marine cold air outbreaks subjected to strong turbulent surface fluxes remain poorly understood despite their importance to high-latitude climate. The Cold-Air outbreak Experiment in the Sub-Arctic Region (CAESAR) research aircraft sampled closed-cells with cloud condensation nuclei concentrations surpassing 680 cm-3, decreasing to 90 cm-3 across a transition to open-cells. The aerosol likely originated from Siberian industrial emissions. With fetch, liquid water paths (LWPs) increase from 120 g m-2 to 270 g m-2 and cloud-top effective diameters increase from 10 μm to 16 μm, coincident with more riming. Ice particle number concentrations (Ni) are generally 2 L-1 or less, but exceed ice nucleating particle number concentrations by 100x. As the cloud-top inversion weakens and the boundary layer deepens further, ice precipitation co-exists with lidar-observed surface cold pools, modulated by entrainment events, juxtaposed with surface-based plumes of warm moist air. Open-cells contain isolated LWP peaks surpassing 500 g m-2 collocated with strong updrafts, adjacent to glaciated cloud. Ni surpasses 10 L-1 at cloud temperatures < -15 °C. Precipitation shafts contain abundant large graupel (> 5 mm diameter) with liquid-equivalent precipitation intensities reaching 3 mm hr-1 developing cold pools with virtual potential temperature depressions reaching 1.3 K. Nonetheless, buoyancy fluxes of 200-250 W m-2 prevent sub-cloud decoupling. The updrafts supporting liquid water production occur at the upwind edge of the cold pools. This case expands the observations needed to better understand mixed-phase Arctic cloud processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ephraim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: