Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE Examine the association between nonfatal strangulation-related probable brain injury (NFS-BI), resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC), and verbal memory, among females who experienced physical intimate partner violence (IPV). METHOD Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was analyzed for 110 females aged 18-60 years who experienced physical IPV. rsFC was characterized by seven graph theory metrics across three brain parcellation atlases (Power, Seitzman, and Schaefer-456 Parcellation[4S]). Responses to the Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire determined IPV-head trauma frequency, experience of probable NFS-BI, and other/additional non-IPV and IPV-related BI. Verbal memory was characterized by three measures from the California Verbal Learning Test, Third Edition: (a) Long Delay, Free Recall, (b) Trials 1-5 correct index scores, and (c) memory retention from Trials 1-5 to Long Delay, Free Recall. RESULTS NFS-BI was significantly associated with reductions in within-default mode network (DMN) connectivity (Power: B = -0.03, p = .003; Seitzman: B = -0.03, p = .005; 4S: B = -0.02, p = .03), DMN segregation (Power: B = -0.04, p = .006; Seitzman: B = -0.04, p = .007; 4S: B = -0.03, p = .02), and global modularity (Power: B = -0.01, p = .02; Seitzman: B = -0.02, p = .008; 4S: B = -0.02, p = .007). Interactions between NFS-BI and within-DMN strength (Power: B = -150.05, p = .03; Seitzman: B = -212.11 p = .01; 4S: B = -204.52, p = .002), DMN segregation (Power: B = -106.97, p = .02; Seitzman: B = -114.54 p = .008; 4S: B = -189.88, p < .001), and modularity (Power: B = -373.80, p = .003; Seitzman: B = -367.35, p = .001; 4S: B = -312.55, p = .006) were significantly associated with memory retention. CONCLUSIONS Those who experienced probable NFS-BI demonstrated altered rsFC compared with those who did not. Interactions between DMN rsFC and NFS-BI were significantly associated with memory retention. Future work should assess individuals with NFS-BI longitudinally to understand its effects on long-term brain health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jain et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: