Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evidence linking wood-modifier uptake and moisture behaviour to mould resistance remains limited in this area. This study compared KBL and AKD treatments of Populus deltoides using diffusion and vacuum-pressure impregnation (VPI), assessing uptake, moisture behaviour, hardness, and Aspergillus niger mould growth. At 5% concentration, KBL diffusion increased weight percent gain (WPG) from 6% at 24 h to nearly 10% at 120 h, whereas VPI produced WPG above 25%, density increase above 20%, and bulking ratio near 4%. Diffusion of 5% AKD produced WPG below 2%, while VPI increased WPG to 7–8%, bulking ratio to 6–7%, and density by nearly 10%. Equilibrium moisture content differed significantly among treatments (p = 0.033), with AKD-treated specimens showing lower values than the control. Hardness was higher in treated groups, but differences were not significant (p = 0.073). Mould-covered area differed significantly among treatments (p < 0.001), with KBL treatments forming the lowest homogeneous group in Duncan’s test, whereas AKD showed no consistent reduction in mould growth. FTIR and NIR showed spectral differences, while PCA explained 97% of spectral variance in the first two components. Overall, impregnation route influenced uptake, whereas moisture resistance and mould response were not directly coupled.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shukla et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: