Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article argues that border wall art depicting homoerotic intimacy between political leaders constitutes a “queer archive” of the global border industrial complex (GBIC). Through an analysis of three murals on the US-Mexico, Israel-Palestine, and Berlin border walls, I demonstrate how these murals function as contradictory rhetorical artifacts. While the border wall murals in this article critique state-sanctioned sexual violence, they often inadvertently replicate the sexist, homophobic, and xenophobic tropes they seek to expose. Employing a queer archival methodology attentive to ephemerality, affect, and non-linear memory, I examine how these transient border artworks reveal what I term “abject intimacies”: the weaponized proximities of cisgender white male leaders who publicly espouse anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ+ policies while engaging in displays of same-sex sensuality. Reading these murals as living, transnational counter-archives illuminates how the GBIC operates through intimate exchanges of power, surveillance technologies, and imperial logics that simultaneously eroticize and criminalize marginalized bodies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alejandra I. Ramírez (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: