Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Armed conflict may disrupt immunization services and increase barriers to childhood vaccination. This study examined determinants of full basic childhood vaccination in Mali and assessed whether they differed between conflict-affected and non-conflict regions. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the 2023-2024 Mali Demographic and Health Survey, including 2859 children aged 12-23 months. Full basic vaccination was defined as receipt of Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccine, three doses of pentavalent vaccine, three doses of oral polio vaccine (excluding the birth dose), and measles vaccine. Survey-weighted logistic regression models were fitted nationally and separately for conflict-affected and non-conflict regions. Interactions between conflict status and selected explanatory variables were tested. RESULTS: Full basic vaccination coverage was 51.87%. Coverage did not differ significantly between conflict-affected and non-conflict regions (50.08% vs 52.64%; p = 0.467), and conflict status was not independently associated with vaccination after adjustment. Antenatal care attendance and facility-based delivery were consistently associated with higher odds of full vaccination. In conflict-affected regions, media exposure and shorter perceived distance to health facilities were also associated with higher vaccination uptake. A significant interaction was observed between conflict status and distance to health facility (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Childhood vaccination coverage in Mali remains suboptimal. Although overall coverage was similar across conflict and non-conflict regions, determinants differed by context, highlighting the need for tailored strategies to improve vaccine uptake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: