Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluating fiscal budget utilization is crucial for understanding fiscal conditions and poverty in Indonesia. This study examines the relationships among locally-generated revenue, central government transfers, income inequality, regional economic conditions, and poverty levels across Indonesian provinces. It utilizes a balanced panel dataset covering 34 provinces from 2018 to 2024, comprising 238 observations. The analysis employs the Pooled Ordinary Least Squares method with heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors, incorporating the unemployment rate, average years of schooling, and Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) at current prices as additional explanatory variables. Locally-generated revenue and economic output exhibit a negative relationship with poverty, whereas central government transfers and income inequality show a positive relationship. Unemployment and education were found to be statistically insignificant. A 1% increase in locally-generated revenue is associated with a 0.039 decrease in the poverty rate, while a 1% increase in central transfers is linked to a 0.070 increase. These contrasting relationships highlight the importance of distinguishing between fiscal revenue sources when analyzing provincial-level poverty. The study’s findings indicate associations between variables rather than causal relationships. Diagnostic tests revealed the presence of serial correlation and heteroskedasticity, necessitating caution in statistical decision-making and suggesting a need for methodological refinement. Furthermore, further research is required regarding transfer allocation mechanisms and the consideration of regional characteristics in the context of poverty alleviation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yusuf et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: