Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The next generation of Stage-V spectroscopic surveys are designed to measure hundreds of millions of galaxy and quasar spectra, extending precision large-scale-structure cosmology to redshifts and volumes well beyond the reach of current Stage-IV facilities. Realising this potential requires revisiting the target selection strategies and designing them explicitly around the depth, multiplexing, and survey time of the new instruments, rather than a direct extrapolation of existing recipes. This work develops and characterises new strategies for the Wide-field Spectroscopic Telescope (WST), a proposed 12-metre, highly multiplexed facility expected to operate in the 2040s. Using deep multi-band photometry, including COSMOS-field data from CLAUDS and HSC, we revisit low-redshift $z<1.6$ tracer selection of SDSS, BOSS/eBOSS, DESI and 4MOST-CRS -- Bright Galaxies, Luminous Red Galaxies, Emission Line Galaxies and quasars -- to photometric depth achievable in the WST era, and introduce a purely magnitude-limited sample (MagMax) exploiting three-dimensional colour-colour star-galaxy separation, and a set of Lyman-Break Galaxy dropout samples extending target selection to $z>2$. Using Fisher-matrix forecasts, we showcase the constraining power of a WST-like cosmological survey on BAO distance parameters α_∥ and α_⊥, the growth rate f, the evolving dark energy equation w₀wₐ, the local-type primordial non-Gaussianity fNLˡᵒᶜ, and the sum of the neutrino mass Σm_ν. The main outcome of this work is an optimisation framework that directly links instrumental capabilities and observing time to cosmological constraining power, providing a science-driven template applicable to the design of future generations of Stage-V spectroscopic surveys.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Payerne et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: