Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a leading cause of adult mortality and lasting disability worldwide. Although intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy have established the reperfusion era, a substantial proportion of patients fail to achieve favorable functional outcomes because macrovascular recanalization does not guarantee effective perfusion at the tissue level. This review systematically examines the neurovascular unit (NVU) and the expanded neurovascular immune network as integrated frameworks for understanding brain injury following reperfusion. We delineate the temporal cascade of pathophysiological events, beginning with acute ischemic energy failure, excitotoxicity, and innate immune sensing by cerebral microvascular endothelial cells and microglia. We then focus on the reperfusion phase as the critical window of neuroimmune interaction, characterized by reactive oxygen species burst, nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation, and matrix-metalloproteinase (MMP) mediated disruption of the blood-brain-barrier (BBB). The chronological infiltration and phenotypic transitions of peripheral immune cells, including neutrophils, classical monocytes, and T lymphocytes, are analyzed in relation to biphasic dynamics of the BBB and evolving therapeutic time windows. Furthermore, we evaluate translational advances in combination strategies that pair agents with anti-inflammatory properties and thrombolysis, interventions targeting NETs, blood brain barrier protection, and immunomodulation strategies tailored to specific time windows, alongside emerging biomarkers and novel delivery technologies. This review aims to provide a framework grounded in evidence for mechanistic understanding and therapeutic optimization toward comprehensive neurovascular and neuroimmune repair in the reperfusion era. Unless otherwise specified, mechanistic findings cited in this review derive predominantly from experimental rodent models (mainly transient middle cerebral artery occlusion, tMCAO) or in vitro studies, and human evidence is explicitly indicated where available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: