Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Neuroscience hypothesizes a canonical microcircuit subserving cortical computation across brain systems. In artificial intelligence, neural networks have become a universal computational substrate. Here, we leverage newly available large-scale data and mapping techniques to compare neural network motifs to the brain. We embedded a spectrum of candidate microcircuit architectures within a common spatial macrocircuit, measuring alignment with an extensive battery of cortical signatures. We find that one specific circuit type--the transformer--uniquely captures fine-grained unit-level circuit details, population-level functional maps and neuronal activity patterns, and systems-level wiring efficiency and behavioral demands. The key ingredient enabling the transformer's success is a learned multiplicative component making relational information available without extensive long-range wiring. These results suggest striking convergence between computational motifs in natural and artificial intelligence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: