Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Soft robot co-design methods can jointly optimise morphology and control, but the resulting designs are often difficult to manufacture, while manufacturable approaches typically restrict actuator placement or require manual assembly. We present a simulation-based co-design framework that jointly optimises material distribution, pneumatic actuator placement and orientation, and control, while producing designs that can be fabricated monolithically using fused deposition modelling. The framework uses a differentiable 2D plane-stress Material Point Method simulator, incorporating an experimentally validated material model and an empirically derived surrogate model of a 3D-printed inflatable actuator. We demonstrate gradient-based optimisation soft robotic arms for prescribed tip trajectories. Optimised designs are transferred directly from simulation to one-shot monolithic FDM fabrication, with integrated actuators and no post-assembly. Physical experiments demonstrate that the resulting arms reproduce the behaviour predicted in simulation. This framework provides a path from task-level objectives to physically realisable soft robots while retaining substantial freedom over both morphology and actuation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wood et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: