Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary Given land-use change threatening both biodiversity and traditional extractive livelihoods since 2004, an action research process in Minas Gerais (Brazil) has focused on the management of two endemic species: the giant earthworm Rhinodrilus alatus and the pequi tree Caryocar brasiliense . Socio-ecological assessments, ecological field surveys and market analyses generated the evidence that extractivists and public institutions used to negotiate management agreements. Despite more than a decade of institutional uncertainty and the absence of formal regulation, local actors maintained voluntary harvesting restrictions, including a closed season during the reproductive period. Ecological evidence supported reassessing the conservation status of R. alatus , enabling discussions on regulated sustainable use. To address seasonal income losses, we developed a community-based pequi processing initiative that aligns livelihood activities with ecological cycles. Over two decades, sustained collaboration, co-produced knowledge and livelihood diversification reduced conflict, strengthened local organization and supported adaptive management under legal uncertainty. This demonstrates that long-term participatory processes can sustain conservation outcomes and reconcile biodiversity conservation with rural livelihoods in socially and biologically diverse landscapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drumond et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: