Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: The relationship between ovarian morphology and primary dysmenorrhea is poorly defined. We examined whether total ovarian volume (TOV) differs by dysmenorrhea status and is associated with multidimensional pain burden. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 118 nulliparous women aged 18–24 years, grouped by worst menstrual pain on a 0–10 visual analog scale (VAS ≥ 2, n = 76; control, n = 42). Pain was assessed with the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and transabdominal ultrasonography was performed on cycle days 2–5. Results: Median TOV was higher with dysmenorrhea (17.04 [12.30–23.48] vs. 11.61 [9.00–15.72] cm3; p < 0.001). Sensory (17.0 [10.0–21.0] vs. 4.0 [1.0–8.0]), affective (4.0 [2.0–6.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0–2.0]), and total SF-MPQ scores (20.0 [13.2–27.0] vs. 4.5 [1.0–10.2]) were all higher (p < 0.001 for each). Each 5 cm3 increase in TOV was associated with higher odds of dysmenorrhea after adjustment for clinical covariates (odds ratio 1.764, 95% CI 1.270–2.681; p = 0.003), although discrimination was modest (area under the curve 0.718). The association was attenuated when restricted to women with bilateral ovarian volumes ≤ 10 cm3. Conclusions: Higher TOV accompanied greater multidimensional pain, but the association was not robust to exclusion of larger ovaries and requires external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ünal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: