Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Video platforms allocate recommendation exposure primarily to maximize engagement, potentially creating behavioural welfare risks for adolescent users. Existing safeguards, such as screen-time reminders and forced interruptions, are largely ex post and do not alter the underlying allocation logic. This study formulates adolescent video recommendation as a constrained allocation problem and develops a multi-objective mixed-integer linear programming (MOMILP) framework that jointly incorporates predicted commercial utility, modeled behavioural risk, educational exposure, and content diversity. Using controlled synthetic experiments, this study compare the proposed framework with a myopic commercial baseline and a post-hoc hard-filtering baseline. Under the reported parameter setting, the proposed model reduces aggregate modeled risk by 58.9% relative to the commercial baseline while retaining 68.5% of its predicted commercial value at a nearly identical delivery cost. Compared with post-hoc filtering, joint optimization retains substantially more commercial value while coordinating multiple governance objectives within the allocation process. Sensitivity, solver-gap, and diversity analyses further demonstrate the trade-offs among commercial utility, modeled risk, computational performance, and exposure structure. These findings illustrate how adolescent-protection objectives can be embedded directly into recommendation allocation rather than added only as post-exposure controls. Results are based on synthetic data and should not be interpreted as causal estimates of real-world welfare improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuxuan Ren (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: