Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study presents an on-device worker-safety framework that retains resolved primary risks as finite contexts for interpreting later worker behavior. Continuous FFH, workload, and BSEC-derived environmental monitoring is integrated with event-triggered No-motion gating and INT8 worker-state recognition. The selected 4.6-s CNN achieved 98.66% macro-F1 in segment-stratified validation, and nRF5340 replay completed the scheduled 1.2-s inference cycle without deadline misses. We distinguish representative literature-derived P1–P4 paradigms from a controlled integrated P4-I/P5 comparison using identical FFH, gas, workload and worker-state inputs, and identical same-episode decision rules. Across 1212 bounded matched event sequences, policy outputs agreed before episode closure; at 1812 post-closure worker-state checkpoints P5 retained prior-risk evidence, yielding 719 monitoring (R1) and 1093 elevated/critical (R2/R3) outputs, whereas P4-I had closed the earlier episode. A separate finite-state audit enumerated 9134 reachable abstract states and 91,861 admissible transitions. These deterministic findings isolate decision semantics rather than field hazard accuracy or subject-independent generalization. Separately, PPK2 profiling on an nRF5340-based Thingy:53 measured 3.319 versus 2.454 mA (periodic CNN versus CNN-skipped), a 26.05% reduction in the nRF5340 SoC mean current measured at the P2 header when inference was skipped.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: